Table 1. Study characteristics | |||||
Study ID | Study title | Corresponding author country | Study design type | Surveillance Type | Evaluation Framework Used |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Klaucke 1988 | Guidelines for Evaluating Surveillance Systems | not reported | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Aenishaenslin 2021 | Evaluating the Integration of One Health in Surveillance Systems for Antimicrobial Use and Resistance: A Conceptual Framework | Canada | Guidance or a descriptive framework | One Health | Not applicable |
Albali 2023 | Comparative Performance Evaluation of the Public Health Surveillance Systems in 6 Gulf Cooperation Countries: Cross-sectional Study | Saudi Arabia | Formal evaluation | Public Health | CDC 2001; CDC 2004 |
Amato 2023 | Evaluation of the pilot wastewater surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 in Norway, June 2022 - March 2023 | Norway | Formal evaluation | Wastewater | CDC 2001; ECDC 2014 |
Anonymous 2001 | Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems | United States of America | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Arinik 2023 | An Evaluation Framework For Comparing Epidemic Intelligence Systems | France | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Auer 2001 | Canadian Aboriginal communities: a framework for injury surveillance | Canada | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | No framework(s) or guidance document(s) were discussed |
Auer 2011 | The relevance of WHO injury surveillance guidelines for evaluation: learning from the Aboriginal Community-Centered Injury Surveillance System (ACCISS) and two institution-based systems | Sweden | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Other |
Azofeifa 2018 | Evaluating Behavioral Health Surveillance Systems | N/A | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | No framework(s) or guidance document(s) were discussed |
Babaie 2015 | Performance Assessment of Communicable Disease Surveillance in Disasters: A Systematic Review | Iran | Domains, themes | Public Health | Not applicable |
BaboMartins 2017 | Economics of zoonoses surveillance in a One Health context: an assessment of Campylobacter surveillance in Switzerland | United Kingdom | Formal evaluation | One Health | Other |
Baker 2006 | Global Public Health Surveillance under New International Health Regulations | New Zealand | Formal evaluation | Public Health | CDC 2001 |
Bennani 2021 | Evaluating Integrated Surveillance for Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in England: A Qualitative Study | United Kingdom | Formal evaluation | One Health | Other |
Bingle 2005 | An Evaluation of the Ontario Rapid Risk Factor Surveillance System | Canada | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | CDC 2001 |
Bordier 2019 | One Health Surveillance: A Matrix to Evaluate Multisectoral Collaboration | Vietnam | Guidance or a descriptive framework | One Health | Not applicable |
Bordier 2020 | Characteristics of One Health surveillance systems: A systematic literature review | Vietnam | Domains, themes | One Health | Not applicable |
Bordier 2022 | Evaluation of Collaboration in a Multisectoral Surveillance System: The ECoSur Tool | Vietnam | Guidance or a descriptive framework | One Health | Not applicable |
Bravata 2004 | Evaluating Detection and Diagnostic Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Response | United States of America | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Buehler 2004 | Framework for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems for Early Detection of Outbreaks: Recommendations from the CDC Working Group | United States of America | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Buehler 2008 | Evaluation of surveillance systems for early epidemic detection | unknown | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Calba 2015 | Surveillance systems evaluation: a systematic review of the existing approaches | France | Domains, themes | Other | Not applicable |
Calba 2015 | Applying participatory approaches in the evaluation of surveillance systems: A pilot study on African swine fever surveillance in Corsica | Belgium | Formal evaluation | Other | OASIS; Other |
Calba 2016 | The Added-Value of Using Participatory Approaches to Assess the Acceptability of Surveillance Systems: The Case of Bovine Tuberculosis in Belgium | France | Formal evaluation | Other | OASIS; Other |
Cameron 2020 | Quantification of the sensitivity of early detection surveillance | France | Domains, themes | Public Health | Not applicable |
Choi 2008 | Enhancing global capacity in the surveillance, prevention, and control of chronic diseases: seven themes to consider and build upon | Canada | Domains, themes | Public Health | Not applicable |
Clara 2020 | Developing monitoring and evaluation tools for event-based surveillance: experience from Vietnam | United States of America | Domains, themes | Public Health | No framework(s) or guidance document(s) were discussed |
Collineau 2022 | Evaluation of the French surveillance system for epidemiological surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in the community and nursing homes | France | Formal evaluation | One Health | OASIS |
Corley 2012 | Assessing the Continuum of Event-Based Biosurveillance Through an Operational Lens | United States of America | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Other | Not applicable |
Crawley 2021 | Using Timeliness Metrics to Track Progress and Identify Gaps in Disease Surveillance | United States of America | Domains, themes | Public Health | Not applicable |
Cutts 1993 | Surveillance for the Expanded Programme on Immunization | United Kingdom | Domains, themes | Public Health | Not applicable |
Declich 1994 | Public health surveillance: historical origins, methods and evaluation | Canada | Domains, themes | Public Health | Not applicable |
DelRioVilas 2022 | Health Surveillance Evaluation in the Policy Cycle | France | Guidance or a descriptive framework | One Health | Not applicable |
Dente 2018 | Integrated surveillance and risk assessment for arbovirus infections: recommendations for enhancing One Health in the Mediterranean Region: MediLabSecure Strategic Document 2018 | not reported | Guidance or a descriptive framework | One Health | Not applicable |
Drewe 2012 | Evaluation of animal and public health surveillance systems: a systematic review | United Kingdom | Domains, themes | Other | Not applicable |
Drewe 2015 | SERVAL: A New Framework for the Evaluation of Animal Health Surveillance | United Kingdom | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Other | Not applicable |
ElAllaki 2013 | Conceptual evaluation of population health surveillance programs: Method and example | Canada | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Ford 2021 | Adequacy of Existing Surveillance Systems to Monitor Racism, Social Stigma and COVID Inequities: A Detailed Assessment and Recommendations | United States of America | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | CDC 2001; Other |
Garcia-Vozmediano 2022 | A One Health Evaluation of the Surveillance Systems on Tick-Borne Diseases in the Netherlands, Spain and Italy | Italy | Formal evaluation | One Health | Other |
Goutard 2022 | THE USE OF PARTICIPATORY METHODS IN THE EVALUATION OF HEALTH SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS | France | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Other | Not applicable |
Groseclose 2010 | Evaluating Public Health Surveillance | not reported | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Groseclose 2013 | Evaluation of syndromic surveillance systems that use healthcare data | United States of America | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Groseclose 2017 | Public Health Surveillance Systems: Recent Advances in Their Use and Evaluation | United States of America | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Hall 2007 | Setting Standards and an Evaluation Framework for Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Surveillance | United States of America | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Harper 2011 | Improving Aboriginal health data capture: evidence from a health registry evaluation | Canada | Formal evaluation | Public Health | CDC 2001 |
Haworth-Brockman 2021 | One Health Evaluation of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Surveillance: A Novel Tool for Evaluating Integrated, One Health Antimicrobial Resistance and Antimicrobial Use Surveillance Programs | Canada | Guidance or a descriptive framework | One Health | Not applicable |
Hendrikx 2011 | OASIS: an assessment tool of epidemiological surveillance systems in animal health and food safety | France | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Other | Not applicable |
Herida 2016 | Economic Evaluations of Public Health Surveillance Systems: a Systematic Review | France | Domains, themes | Public Health | Not applicable |
Hoinville 2013 | Proposed terms and concepts for describing and evaluating animal-health surveillance systems | United Kingdom | Domains, themes | Other | Not applicable |
Innes 2022 | Enhancing global health security in Thailand: Strengths and challenges of initiating a One Health approach to avian influenza surveillance | United States of America | Formal evaluation | One Health | CDC 2001; Other |
Jajosky 2004 | Evaluation of reporting timeliness of public health surveillance systems for infectious diseases | United States of America | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | No framework(s) or guidance document(s) were discussed |
Lucero-Obusan 2022 | Public health surveillance in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs: evaluation of the Praedico surveillance system | United States of America | Formal evaluation | Public Health | CDC 2001 |
Mader 2021 | OASIS evaluation of the French surveillance network for antimicrobial resistance in diseased animals (RESAPATH): success factors underpinning a well-performing voluntary system | France | Formal evaluation | One Health | OASIS |
Marbus 2020 | Experience of establishing severe acute respiratory surveillance in the Netherlands: Evaluation and challenges | Netherlands | Formal evaluation | Public Health | CDC 2001; ECDC 2014; Other |
Mitchell 2009 | The development of an evaluation framework for injury surveillance systems | Australia | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Morbey 2021 | Evaluating multi-purpose syndromic surveillance systems - a complex problem | United Kingdom | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Muellner 2018 | SurF: an innovative framework in biosecurity and animal health surveillance evaluation | New Zealand | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Other | Not applicable |
Paternoster 2017 | The degree of One Health implementation in the west nile virus integrated surveillance in Northern Italy, 2016 | Italy | Formal evaluation | One Health | Other |
Pavlin 2013 | Syndromic surveillance for infectious diseases | United States of America | Domains, themes | Public Health | Not applicable |
Pelican 2019 | Synergising tools for capacity assessment and One Health operationalisation | United States of America | Guidance or a descriptive framework | One Health | Not applicable |
Peyre 2019 | The RISKSUR EVA tool (Survtool): A tool for the integrated evaluation of animal health surveillance systems | France | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Other | Not applicable |
Peyre 2022 | Synthesis-evaluate to better inform: A way to strengthening health surveillance systems | France | Other | One Health | Not applicable |
Reintjes 2007 | Benchmarking national surveillance systems: a new tool for the comparison of communicable disease surveillance and control in Europe | Germany | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Romano 2022 | An Evaluation of Syndromic Surveillance-Related Practices Among Selected State and Local Health Agencies | United States of America | Domains, themes | Public Health | No framework(s) or guidance document(s) were discussed |
Rüegg 2022 | Guidance for evaluating integrated surveillance of antimicrobial use and resistance | Switzerland | Guidance or a descriptive framework | One Health | Not applicable |
Sahal 2009 | Communicable diseases surveillance lessons learned from developed and developing countries: Literature review | Denmark | Domains, themes | Public Health | Not applicable |
Sandberg 2021 | Assessment of Evaluation Tools for Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Based on Selected Case Studies | Denmark | Guidance or a descriptive framework | One Health | Not applicable |
Sosin 2003 | Draft Framework for Evaluating Syndromic Surveillance Systems | United States of America | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Tegegne 2023 | OH-EpiCap: a semi-quantitative tool for the evaluation of One Health epidemiological surveillance capacities and capabilities | France | Guidance or a descriptive framework | One Health | Not applicable |
Thacker 1988 | A METHOD FOR EVALUATING SYSTEMS OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE | United States of America | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Thacker 1988 | PUBLIC HEALTH SURVEILLANCE IN THE UNITED STATES | United States of America | Domains, themes | Public Health | Not applicable |
VasconcelosGioia 2021 | Informing resilience building: FAO's Surveillance Evaluation Tool (SET) Biothreat Detection Module will help assess national capacities to detect agro-terrorism and agro-crime | Italy | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Velasova 2015 | Evaluation of the usefulness at national level of the dairy cattle health and production recording systems in Great Britain | not reported | Formal evaluation | Other | SERVAL; Other |
WorldHealthOrganization 2004 | Overview of the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating surveillance and response systems for communicable diseases | not reported | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Yang 2022 | Understanding occupational safety and health surveillance: expert consensus on components, attributes and example measures for an evaluation framework | United States of America | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Peyre 2022 | Principles for evaluation of one health surveillance: The EVA book | France | Guidance or a descriptive framework | One Health | The RISKSUR EVA tool (Survtool); Other |
Ribeiro 2019 | Overcoming challenges for designing and implementing the One Health approach: A systematic review of the literature | Netherlands | Domains, themes | One Health | Not applicable |
Meynard 2008 | Proposal of a framework for evaluating military surveillance systems for early detection of outbreaks on duty areas | French Guiana | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Health Canada 2004; Other |
Margevicius 2014 | Advancing a Framework to Enable Characterization and Evaluation of Data Streams Useful for Biosurveillance | United States of America | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Hitziger 2021 | System Thinking and Citizen Participation Is Still Missing in One Health Initiatives ‚ Lessons From Fifteen Evaluations | Switzerland | Domains, themes | One Health | Not applicable |
Ng'etich 2021 | Development and validation of a framework to improve neglected tropical diseases surveillance and response at sub-national levels in Kenya | South Africa | Guidance or a descriptive framework | Public Health | Not applicable |
Figures
Table 1 — Study characteristics
Upset Plot
Framework used to evaluate surveillance systems
Type of surveillance system